|
 By Dr. Jim Freiburger Two rivers converse Blending fresh, brackish waters Innovate new stream Looking out my window, I witness the energetic, freshwater Exeter River merging with the Tidal Basin River Swampscott. Together they meld into a new passageway to the nearby ocean. Fledgling fish, hatched upriver in the freshwater, swim downstream through the now blended waters, and acclimate as adults in a new ocean setting. The combined rivers created an environment for a new generation of fish to cope with the future. The blended rivers pathway is analogous to the role Global Citizens (GCC) has chosen to create an intergenerational approach to world issues. GCC provides a space in which a younger generation of leaders can converse and share their ideas and enthusiasm with an older generation of peacemakers and leaders. In a recent GCC Circle, an Israeli young man, Yigal Elhanan, and a Palestinian young man, Arab Aramin, shared their stories. Elhanan’s five-year-old sister was killed by a Palestinian bomber. Aramin’s 10-year-old sister was shot by an Israeli soldier. They recreated the role of their parents, founders of the Parent’s Circle for Reconciliation and Peace, had in helping them move through hatred and trauma to become activists for reconciliation and peace. Similarly, intergenerational leaders from Ukraine, Nepal, Syria, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, India, and America have presented their stories in GCC circles. Several intergenerational leaders are also represented on the GCC advisory council and board. The GCC Emerging Leader program is a model for intergenerational cooperation to develop reconciliation and peace.  Dr. Jim Freiburger is a retired professor of organizational leadership and corporate social responsibility to graduate students from around the world. He currently enjoys applying the Haiku expression and the lens of his camera to capture scenes in nature. Freiburger has been actively associated with Global Citizens Circle during its 50-year existence. In 2022, he authored a memoir, “An Iowa Farm Boy’s Odyssey: Priest, Parent, Professor.“ Contact him at [email protected] Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle. GCC provides a space in which a younger generation of leaders can converse and share their ideas and enthusiasm with an older generation of peacemakers and leaders.
1 Comment
Global Citizen’s Circle’s Role in Pushing Back on the Pushback on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion11/13/2024  By James McKim, PMP, ITIL My experience helping a wide range of organizations improve their performance has resulted in a deep understanding of the value of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In contemporary discourse, DEI has emerged as critical focal points across various sectors, from corporate boardrooms to educational institutions and community settings. These initiatives aim to dismantle systemic barriers, promote equal opportunities, and foster environments where every individual feels valued and respected regardless of their background and can perform at their best. However, the journey towards living into DEI is often met with resistance, skepticism, and pushback from individuals or groups reluctant to embrace change. Being introduced to the Global Citizens Circle by current Board Chair Sean O’Kane, I saw an opportunity to join an organization that has had and has the great potential to have an even greater impact on how the pushback against DEI can be eliminated for the betterment of both organizations and society. So, just what is this pushback? The Pushback Against DEI Pushback against DEI may stem from a multitude of factors including fear of change, ideological differences, misconceptions about DEI, discomfort with confronting privilege and biases, or concerns about perceived threats to existing power structures. We can view the pushback as existing at 3 levels: interpersonal, group/systemic, and structural as shown in the figure.  At the interpersonal level, based on research by Gartner, pushback generally takes 3 forms in the context of culture – how we interact with each other in society writ large.  Image credit; Gartner https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/how-to-navigate-pushback-to-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-efforts
At the Group/Systemic (organizational/institutional) level, based on research by Forbes pushback generally takes the form of:
At the Structural level, based on research by Professor Tricia Rose of Brown, pushback generally takes the form of laws or best practices such as gender pay inequities or redlining that boost a particular industry at the expense of underrepresented individuals. Education impacts health, health impacts education. Both impact the ability for people to get good jobs to gain income to be able to pay for education, and health… see the vicious cycle?  Image credit: Axios https://www.axios.com/2024/04/02/dei-backlash-diversity The reality is that DEI is being discussed more than ever. As is reported in the Axios article “There are still companies committed to hiring people from diverse backgrounds, figuring out how to foster inclusive workplaces and treating people fairly. But they're less likely to use those initials.” Global Citizens Circle’s Role Global Citizens Circle (GCC) plays a significant role in countering the backlash against DEI efforts by fostering open dialogue and understanding among diverse groups. Since 1974, GCC has consistently brought together diverse groups of people, from world leaders to local activists, to engage in meaningful conversations on important social and global issues: including race relations in the US, Northern Ireland's troubles, South Africa's struggles, and women's rights. Want examples?
These discussions aim to inspire change by highlighting the importance of DEI in creating equitable opportunities and environments for all individuals, regardless of their background by encouraging intergenerational dialogue and empowering youth voices. This is how GCC helps sustain the momentum for DEI initiatives amidst growing opposition and helps create a world where we all can not only survive but thrive. I am proud to join GCC at this critical time in our world. Won’t you join us? James McKim is the managing partner of Organizational Ignition, a management consulting practice. He is a sought-after organizational performance speaker, coach, change manager, and author of the bestselling book "The Diversity Factor: Igniting Superior Organizational Performance." Over his 35+ year career, he has helped small and large organizations, for-profit and nonprofit, ignite efficiency and growth through the aligning of people, process, and technology. Mr. McKim is known internationally for his current focus on organizational and individual performance through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). He is recognized by industry watchers such as Atd, Brandon Hall, Bersin Associates, Axelos, and PMI for his dedication to creating win-win situations between organizations and their employees. In addition to founding two companies, he has held senior leadership roles at or worked with organizations such as Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Fidelity, Dartmouth Hitchcock, and the Massachusetts Partnership for Diversity in Education in defining and executing strategic plans with an eye toward organizational performance. As the Chair of the Episcopal Church’s National Executive Council Committee Anti-Racism & Reconciliation, Mr. McKim was the principal writer of the church's guidelines on anti-racism and reconciliation. As President of the Manchester Branch of the NAACP, he works regularly with governments and businesses to eliminate discrimination. He is a frequent conference presenter, a guest on radio and television shows, serves as Chair of the Finance Committee of the NH PBS Board of Directors, serves on the board of Global Citizen Circle, and delights in being the vocalist for the jazz band The Episcocats. Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle. GCC helps sustain the momentum for DEI initiatives amidst growing opposition and helps create a world where we all cannot only survive but thrive. I am proud to join GCC at this critical time in our world. Won’t you join us?  By José Tulio Gálvez Contreras In a world marked by uncertainty and division, effective leadership is crucial. The Global Citizen Circle (GCC) shines as a beacon of hope, uniting leaders to inspire tomorrow’s change-makers. My journey with GCC began during the pandemic, a challenging time when many felt lost. As a Latino immigrant from Honduras, GCC became a vital source of inspiration and connection. I arrived in the United States in 2007 on a scholarship, driven by the dream of one day giving back to and transforming my home country. In those early years, my aspirations burned brightly. I envisioned creating positive change and uplifting my community. However, as time went on, that fire began to fade. The weight of isolation and uncertainty took its toll. While my dreams remained alive, they lacked the passion I once felt. It was during the pandemic, grappling with these feelings of disconnection, that I discovered GCC. GCC emerged as a platform where diverse voices could unite, fostering dialogue, collaboration, and inspiration—essential elements for effective leadership. The organization created circles of conversation, allowing individuals from various backgrounds to share their experiences and aspirations. This sense of community was crucial during such chaotic times, especially as we confronted not only the pandemic but also the urgent call to support the Black Lives Matter movement and stand against oppression. One of the key lessons from my involvement with GCC is the realization that I am not alone in my struggles. Many others share the desire to enact change in their communities. This understanding reignited my sense of purpose and revealed that our diverse backgrounds enhance the dialogue about our collective future. The stories and insights shared within GCC circles underscored the strength found in unity and the power of collective action. What sets GCC apart is its commitment to empowering individuals as agents of change. By bringing together leaders from different fields, GCC encourages discussions on pressing issues such as social justice and environmental sustainability. These conversations serve as catalysts for action, prompting participants to reflect on their roles in their communities and the wider world. Through GCC, I learned that effective leadership isn’t merely about wielding power; it’s about listening, understanding, and collaborating toward shared goals. Engaging with fellow members provided invaluable support, motivating me to take an active role in my community. Together, we brainstorm ideas and hold each other accountable for change, reinforcing that real transformation often begins at the grassroots level. In conclusion, the Global Citizen Circle illustrates the transformative power of community and dialogue in fostering leadership. During a fragmented time, GCC offered hope and connection, profoundly shaping my journey as a Latino immigrant. It reignited my passion for change and strengthened my commitment to helping Honduras. As we move forward, we must recognize our potential to contribute to a more equitable world. Through organizations like GCC, we can cultivate future leaders, united by a shared vision for positive change. José Tulio Gálvez Contreras is the Director of Affordable Solar at Solar One, a position he has held since 2019. He manages solar projects and leads research initiatives to enhance solar access for multifamily affordable housing. With over a decade of experience in renewable energy, sustainability, and community development, José is committed to addressing social and environmental injustices. He is currently completing his doctoral studies in Public and Urban Policy at The New School, focusing on environmental justice and energy democracy. José holds master's degrees in Public and Urban Policy and Environmental Law and Policy. In his free time, he enjoys nature, meditation, martial arts, dancing, exploring new cuisines, and meeting new people. Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle. What sets GCC apart is its commitment to empowering individuals as agents of change. By bringing together leaders from different fields, GCC encourages discussions on pressing issues such as social justice and environmental sustainability. These conversations serve as catalysts for action, prompting participants to reflect on their roles in their communities and the wider world.
Battles over Confederate flags and monuments persist and suggest that the issues fought over in the American Civil War and Civil Rights Movement are unresolved. How we confront symbols of statues, flags and anthems determine the extent of domestic tranquility we can achieve as a nation. How can public commemoration shape a collective narrative that builds, rather than strains the ties that bind us together?
In Feb. 2021, Global Citizens Circle (GCC) addressed this question in a stirring circle. Discussion leaders included American politician, lawyer and author Mitch Landrieu, whose book, “In the Shadow of Statues: A White Southerner Confronts History,” speaks to his personal journey confronting the issue of race and institutional racism that still plagues America. Circle discussion leaders also included Imari Paris Jefferies, Ph.D., Tracyann Williams, and Dr. Craig Stutman. 
This important circle discussion is now part of GCC’s engaging Dialogue2Action series. The overview video can be viewed below. Review the discussion guide here. There’s never been a better time to participate in one of GCC’s Dialogue2Action discussions with your friends, colleagues, and community. There is a difference between remembrance of history and reverence of it.  By R. Rahini Like many other Afghans, I experienced a period of extreme terror and bewilderment in August 2021 when the Taliban seized power in the nation. I realized we had to make a choice for our future when my family and I saw the world crumble around us for a few days. Despite having very little money to make the trip, my wife and I decided to leave Afghanistan. In the hopes of finding security and stability, we made the decision to go to Pakistan, but this would not be a simple journey. We met many difficulties on our journey, particularly at the numerous checkpoints we went through along the way. Each time, we were questioned and treated harshly when it was discovered that we were Hazaras. Prejudice permeated their responses, and we were turned away at multiple checkpoints. People from the Hazara community were not allowed to cross the border freely by the government. Although this was very discouraging, we persisted until we were eventually able to enter Pakistan. After arriving in Pakistan, we encountered new challenges. I quickly discovered that it was very hard to obtain a job there, which also made it hard to pay for even the most basic of bills due to our tight budget. One of the most difficult periods of our lives was the month we spent in Pakistan. My present employer made me a job offer just when it seemed like we were out of options. In the middle of the mayhem, it felt like a lifeline. After talking about the possibility with my spouse, we concluded that it would not be feasible to remain in Pakistan without any assistance or a certain future. Despite the risks, it seemed that returning to Afghanistan was the only option. We made the tough decision to return, and I began working at my new job. When I got back, though, I noticed something that made my heart hurt. Like so many other women and girls in Afghanistan, my wife and sister had given up on life. Due to the new regime's constraints, they were forced to stay in our home and were unable to continue their studies. They felt apprehensive about their future, dissatisfied, and frustrated. When I saw this, I realized I had to do something. The ladies in my life couldn't continue to live their dreams in silence. Upon starting my search, I discovered that women might qualify for a number of scholarships provided they met the English language proficiency criteria. My wife and sister were not able to access an accredited educational system, so I took it upon myself to teach them English. We worked nonstop for six months. I taught them English every day, and over time, they improved gradually. My sister and wife were eventually prepared to go through the required interviews and exams to get the scholarships they had been pursuing. They were admitted after putting in months of arduous effort and devotion. It was a triumphant moment for me as well, as I knew that I had assisted them in escaping the constraints placed upon them. However, this was insufficient. I came to see how many other Afghani women and girls were facing the same challenges. Despite having hopes, potential, and goals, they were not allowed to pursue an education. I made the decision for girls because I was motivated by my wife and sister's achievements. I set out to assist them in learning English so they might break free from the limitations holding them back and become eligible for scholarships. I'm happy to report that about 15 girls currently participate English language program. Like my wife and sister, they are putting in a lot of work, and I have no doubt that they will accomplish great things as well. They're going to apply for scholarships, and maybe soon, they'll be able to continue their study and establish themselves outside of Afghanistan. When I look back, my trip from Pakistan to Afghanistan was a homecoming to both my native country and my purpose in life. I came to see that I could still have an impact despite everything. My impulse to provide the same help to other women and girls who had been denied the chance to pursue their education came from seeing my wife and sister find hope once more. This is not the end of my journey. Observing the girls who visit the center every day, I can see their determination. Their perseverance and bravery in facing challenges serve as a reminder of the strength and fortitude of Afghan women. I'm filled with pride and hope as they get ready for their futures. Despite the difficult times Afghanistan is facing, I will do everything in my power to maintain the flickering flame of empowerment and education. R. Rahimi was born in 1991 in Bamyan, Afghanistan. After finishing school, he went to Kabul Polytechnic University to study Information Technology and graduated in 2017. Post-graduation, he worked as a research assistant with Kelly Franklin, PhD candidate in the Systems Ecology Program at the University of Montana for about six months. Rahimi went on to work at MEDAIR as a quality assurance assistant from 2018-2021, before joining an international humanitarian organization as an IT operations assistant. Throughout his career, he has gained experience in research, quality control, and IT operations, especially in humanitarian work.
Despite the difficult times Afghanistan is facing, I will do everything in my power to maintain the flickering flame of empowerment and education.  By Sonja Meijer Hannah Arendt, a German American historian and political thinker, made significant contributions to political theory and philosophy, which continue to be studied today. Arendt argues that thinking is a political activity. Engaging and thinking with others in the political sphere is central to a fulfilling life. Arendt has explored issues from totalitarianism in works like “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” an examination of “The Human Condition,” her views on evil when covering the trial of Adolf Eichmann, her distinction between the Public and Private spheres, and her advocacy for human rights, as she herself was a refugee. Arendt emphasizes the importance of engaging in political discourse with others. By entering the political realm, we leave our private life to appear in front of others, with the use of speech and action. By presenting ourselves, we can be recognized by others and therefore attain a sense of individual freedom. Arendt believes that if we appear in front of others, our existence is acknowledged, leading to the experience of human plurality and eventually reality. Arendt argues that good and meaningful conversations occur when two individuals are working together to understand each other. As we cannot know another person merely from observation, we have a responsibility to engage in dialogue. We need to actively seek answers to the questions we have about someone. Not only do we come to understand the other person through dialogue, but we also come to learn more about ourselves. Through this collaborative exploration, we shed light on who we are as individuals and how we fit into the larger world. Not only is it important to have dialogue with others, but one must also be able to have dialogue with themselves. Arendt states that “no man can keep his conscience intact who cannot actualize the dialogue with himself, that is, who lacks the solitude required for all forms of thinking.” Arendt believes that our inner dialogue, which she calls a “two-in-one” conversation, is necessary when examining our conscience. In this two-in-one, this thought process turns into a dialogue consisting of myself asking questions and my other self answering them. Arendt argues that “living together with others begins with living together with oneself.” For one to engage in inner dialogue, one must enter a world of solitude. Arendt’s notion of solitude is a space for self-discovery and introspection. A person cannot enter the public realm as a political being without first thinking in solitude. Solitude, as Arendt sees it, offers us a remedy to an increasingly lonely society. Rather than following a traditional way of solving loneliness – the view of engaging more with others – one should spend more time in solitude. Our society is dealing with an epidemic of loneliness. With the development of technology, specifically social media, we spend more time alone, not engaging in dialogue with ourselves or others. This time alone is often spent scrolling on Instagram, checking emails, or watching TV. We have become immersed in the screens that we deem as entertainment, and we now consider it our ‘alone’ time or ‘me’ time. But this is not what Arendt meant by spending time with ourselves. We are no longer taking time to speak with our other self in solitude, away from distractions. Our attention span is even shorter than previous years, and we become easily bored and exist in this world of loneliness. We are no longer experiencing the companionship of our other self within the two-in-one. As we are no longer engaging in the self-understanding that emerges from inner dialogue, we are ill-prepared for participating in the public sphere. We are losing what makes us distinct from others as we hide behind screens and appear less and less in front of others. Solitude is integral to the life of a human being, and without this space for introspection, we lose our ability for thought and therefore our freedom. Arendt talks about the dangers of totalitarianism. In the world of totalitarianism, one is taught what to think rather than how to think. Totalitarianism acts like a magnet, where individuals are pulled so close together that they lose their individuality and merge into one. Totalitarian regimes seek to eradicate all differences of thought by removing the political space that allows for new and transformative ideas to be produced. Without the ability to think one becomes lonely. In contrast to the lonely man, the solitary man is completely alone but, as Arendt sees it, he is “together with himself.” Thinking in solitude is a dialogue between “me and myself.” Arendt notes that the lonely person can save themselves from loneliness by engaging in solitary dialogue. By being in solitude, we can expand our minds and question our own views and perspectives. Arendt also highlights the repercussions of abstaining from meaningful reflection. Her essay “Thinking and Moral Considerations” grapples with the connection between thinking and evil. Arendt used the phrase “the banality of evil” to describe Adolf Eichmann, a high-ranking Nazi official who was a significant figure in the Holocaust. Arendt did not see Eichmann as a “monstrous” figure but rather an ordinary bureaucrat who committed evil acts without deeply questioning or reflecting on the moral implications of his actions. These evil deeds were committed on a large scale, and Arendt viewed this as “not stupidity but a curious, quite authentic inability to think.” She argues that thinking, this two-in-one conversation, can deter individuals from evildoing. Arendt posits that when you are in solitude, you are engaged in thought which may “be the most solitary of all activities” but you are never “without a partner and without company.” Delving deep into conversation with yourself will always be sufficient companionship. In conclusion, Arendt’s thinking highlights the importance of solitude as a space to understand ourselves through engaging in a two-in-one dialogue. By critiquing totalitarianism, she highlights the dangers of depriving people of solitude. Losing this space for solitude means losing the freedom that comes with thinking. Solitude is a space to discover one’s identity through sustained reflection. The process of having dialogue with our self encourages us to question our own values while also opening ourselves to the other. This preparation better equips us for acting in the political sphere. By balancing solitude and our social interactions, we can have a fulfilling and meaningful life. Everyone can feel lonely at times, but Arendt encourages us to continuously cultivate our inner-thinking partner to find refuge in solitude. Finally, I would like to leave you with a poem I wrote about solitude: Arendt’s wise words she tells us that solitude is a place for us to reflect where a person can be in conversation with oneself, can be fulfilled by one’s own presence and that solitude cannot be mistaken for loneliness (but I am too often lonely and wonder how I can enter the world of solitude)  Sonja Meijer is a recent graduate of Bryn Mawr College, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy. She is half American and half Dutch, and grew up in the Geneva, Switzerland area. Her interests are in social justice, poetry, theater, and sports. She has been involved with Global Citizen Circle for the past year and served as an intern for GCC in 2023. Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle. Power is actualized only where word and deed have not parted company, where words are not empty and deeds not brutal, where words are not used to veil intentions but to disclose realities, and where deeds are not used to violate and destroy but to establish relations and create new realities.  By Phoebe de Larrabeiti I. “The power is in your person.” – Dolores Huerta, 2019 GCC discussion leader 1982, Oxfordshire, England It’s the evening. I lean up against my mum’s legs in our kitchen. I should probably be in bed but something is happening. I can feel it. The kitchen is full of people packing food, talking feverishly; nukes, Reagan, Thatcher. I don’t understand everything but I know I can help. Loading food into our battered old Lada (a Russian car bought to piss off our neighbors). These friends, this community of outliers and intellectuals are making meals for the Women of Greenham Common. This was a women’s only peace camp, protesting NATO's decision to site U.S. cruise missiles (guided nuclear missiles) in the U.K. These courageous women had formed a human barricade at the local military airfield base. Often brutally evicted, sometimes imprisoned, they would only return more defiant. My mum and her friends were keeping them fed. I understood then that the U.S. was a powerful nation. Housing their nuclear weapons on U.K. soil crossed a line my community chose to resist. Their resistance seeped under my skin and left its mark. II. “Speak truth to power.” – Kerry Kennedy, 2023 GCC discussion leader March 2003, Dallas Fort Worth International Airport “What do y’all think about the war?” exclaimed the small woman with the big hair guiding us on to the airport shuttle bus. “Where am I?” I thought, already disconcerted from the long haul flight and being held by immigration officers over an anomaly with my student visa. In the past month my world had turned upside down; my mum died suddenly and a trans-Atlantic move destined for New England had brought us instead to Texas. What I could never have anticipated was that our arrival date would coincide exactly with the invasion of Iraq by U.S. and U.K. forces. The Marriott hotel, our first ‘home,' was filled with reserve troops. Images of Blair, Bush and Saddam Hussein played endlessly on the barroom tv. I thought only of the mass mobilization of those against the invasion, the largest protest ever on U.K. soil in London just one month before. In every sense, I felt a million miles from home. There’s nothing like volunteering at a children’s hospital to ground you in a place, however lost you feel. Within a month I was working at the Scottish Rite Hospital for Children in downtown Dallas, making friends, navigating cultural differences as best I could. Engaging my colleagues in conversations about politics, particularly the invasion of Iraq, elicited a reaction I had never witnessed before. The war had started now, and it was unpatriotic to question the motives of those in power. I was letting down the troops. Wasn’t it the opposite, I would counter. Doesn’t democracy demand that we hold those in power accountable? Now I felt the fire in my blood. III. “‘Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that.’ Words my grandfather lived by.” – Yolanda Renee King, 2022 GCC discussion leader June 26, 2024. USCIS Offices, Bedford, NH If you had to complete the extensive N-400 application for naturalization you would be asked: Were you EVER a member of, or did you EVER serve in, help, or otherwise participate in, any of the following groups: an insurgent organization (a group that uses weapons and fights against a government)? For the American Democracy section of the civics test you will learn that the “rule of law” states no one is above the law; that our leaders must obey the law. Unless, of course. they start to re-write them. We were living in extraordinary times, the very fabric of what defined a nation and nationality was being undone. Perhaps it was seeing my bright, brilliant, resilient daughter cast her first vote last November that got me thinking. Was it time to become a U.S. citizen? Or maybe something in the air that smelled unsettlingly like authoritarianism propelled me to acknowledge we might not have much time. More than anything it was people, the people I have met here in this beautiful country, a country like most of us – steeped in contradictions. When I cast my vote in November, I might be helping to make history. Here’s hoping. Phoebe de Larrabeiti joined Global Citizens Circle (GCC) as its assistant director in February 2020, with a background in nonprofit management, event organizing and higher education liaison. She works concurrently as a licensed therapist with experience of group facilitation and a particular interest in trauma resolution. Doesn’t democracy demand that we hold those in power accountable? Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle.
 By Michael Lockett My introduction to the GCC (Global Citizens Circle) was random and beautiful. Picture this: I was working with a longtime Circle member on a separate project when he invited me to create an intro for a Circle on monuments. You know, those grand statues erected to glorify folks who, let's be honest, the world would've been better off without all that bronze and marble. You know, with all the glossed-over global atrocities and all. I created a film piece, and before I knew it, I was in deep. My work with the Circle blossomed into a full-fledged relationship with GCC, and after happily contributing so much, the directors and board eventually invited me to join them. I couldn't have been happier. I'd found my tribe of people committed to making a difference. Both outside and inside GCC, I'm a visual storyteller. That's just a fancy way of saying I'm a screenwriter, director, and semi-reluctant producer. I've always been involved in the arts because it's the one place where you can tell a story exactly the way you see it in your head and, if you're lucky, convince others to see it the same way, too. Whether behind the camera, in front of a blank page, or begrudgingly managing a budget, my goal is always the same: to tell stories that matter. Sometimes they entertain, sometimes they educate, and sometimes they do a bit of both. But they always, always make you think. My journey into activism wasn't so much a decision as it was a destiny. Being a BIPOC person in America means that activism is almost a default setting. Just existing and trying to thrive in this environment puts you in that space, whether you like it or not. As a kid, my parents often took me to soup kitchens to serve. As much as I tried to hate it, cutting into my time with friends and toys, there was a strange joy in serving others. I kept volunteering, and as I grew up with a deep understanding of the world's precarious state — thanks, white supremacist, patriarchal colonizers — it wasn't so much a leap into activism as it was a continuation of service. My cause, if you want to call it that, is to dismantle white supremacist colonizing principles and actions. It's the gateway drug to pretty much every societal ill we face today. Dismantling white supremacy might sound like an impossible task, but I believe there's a doable two-step solution. First, we need to get real about our history — no sugar-coating, no glossing over the atrocities. We need actual truth-telling on a global scale, explaining what was done, why it was done, and by whom. Once we get that straight, we can move on to the next step: reparations. This means reimbursing for compounded losses and returning stolen relics and resources. If we did this, the entire world could reset, and we'd be looking at a whole new ballgame within a generation. Sure, it sounds daunting, but what's the alternative – more of the same? My educational background is in visual communications, and I'm grateful that I get to use it every day to push this massive boulder of change further up the hill. Whether through film, social media, or public speaking, I use the tools I've learned to amplify voices that need to be heard and to tell stories that need to be told. Down the road, I hope to keep using these skills to create even more impactful work, maybe even tackling projects I haven't dared to dream of yet. In terms of inspiration, leadership, or encouragement, I don't have to look far. GCC is filled with amazing people doing brave things for the betterment of humanity, and they inspire me every day. But I also draw a lot of strength from the lessons my parents taught me, and from my wife and son, who are both outspoken, joyful warriors in their own unique ways. They keep me grounded and remind me why the fight is worth it. Finally, to the young people out there who are itching to create positive change, here's my advice: find your tribe. Find those like-minded, motivated, and collaborative changemakers who can keep you buoyant and focused. An individual might get swept away by the storm, but a group can withstand anything. And remember, the world doesn't change by accident — it changes because people like you refuse to let injustice rule the day. So, get out there and make some waves. Michael Lockett is a New York screenwriter, director, and sometimes producer. A lifelong storyteller, Michael graduated from the University of Delaware with a degree in visual communications. After a stint in advertising, periodical design, and marketing/PR, he delved back into the longer storytelling forms with film and TV screenwriting. Although specializing in horror with dark, thought-provoking overtones, Michael is always prepared and happy to lend a hand or idea to make his or others' projects a success. Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle. And remember, the world doesn't change by accident — it changes because people like you refuse to let injustice rule the day. So, get out there and make some waves. 
By Pamme Boutselis
Some of the most powerful conversations happen within Global Citizens Circle's Circle events. But they don't end there. The thought-provoking revelations and ideas are brought forth into new arenas by all who attend. The problem was, though, you had to be there, to enter into the initial conversation and take away these valuable thoughts to keep them going. But when Covid entered the picture, the conversation widened via virtual Circles. The Circles were recorded and shared in the aftermath on YouTube, allowing greater access to all. Now, many of these Circles have been distilled into bite-sized pieces, opening access even more via GCC's Dialogue2Action series. Each edition features a video synopsis and discussion guide of these incredible events. This is perfect for broadening individual and group understanding – and furthering the conversation even more. During these troubling and often divisive times, Dialogue2Action may be just what you need to better understand complicated issues, find talking points to open discussion with others, and create solutions in places where you may have felt like you had none. We invite you to watch this 20-minute video, “Movements for Change: Stories of Challenge and Success” featuring:
And then, review the Movements for Change discussion guide to see how you, too, can continue this conversation.
Be sure to check out all of the featured discussions in Dialogue2Action. Pamme Boutselis is an award-winning writer and content producer, currently serving as a senior director of content marketing and a communication adjunct at Southern New Hampshire University. She loves hearing and sharing stories. As a writer spanning a 25-plus-year career, her work has been featured in print and online via news media, career and education-focused blogs, regional magazines, technology publications and more. A serial volunteer, Boutselis has been a TEDx organizer since 2013 and a speaker coach. She’s been fortunate to work with dozens of nonprofits throughout the years and serves as a communication advisor for Global Citizens Circle. Connect with her on LinkedIn. Please note: Each week, we invite members of the greater Global Citizens Circle community to contribute to GCC Voices. The views and opinions expressed in each blog post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Global Citizens Circle. If you do not join in; if you do not take action to solve your particular issue, it's never going to get solved...so you've got to understnad that you're the one that has to step up...and do whatever it takes to solve this issue."  Global Citizen Circle Board Chair Sean O'Kane is a retired executive with 30+ years of experience in customer relations, operations, business development, alliance building, thought leadership, strategic management, and growth in both the private and public sectors, nationally and globally. He has held successful careers in hospitality, government, and technology. Beyond GCC, Sean serves – and has served – on several boards, including NH Public Broadcasting System, Franklin Pierce University (2013-2023), Bellwether Community Credit Union, Sail Portsmouth/Sea Challenge, and Granite United Way, Community Impact Committee. Tell us a bit about your professional background and how it led you to where you are today. I enjoyed a 24-year career in the hospitality industry. Although I never worked for Dunfey International Hotels, I first met Jack (Dunfey) in 1963 when I was 8 years old. It was the influence of the Dunfeys and my deep admiration for the family that led to my own hotel career. In my career, I was recognized as the General Manager of the Year in New Hampshire, General Manager of the Year in the U.S by the American Hotel and Lodging Association, and Travel Person of the Year in New Hampshire. I also served as the chair of the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce, chair of the NH Lodging and Restaurant Association and as vice chair of the NH Political Library. In 2004, I was appointed, by then-Governor Benson, as Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development. In that time, I led trade missions to 11 countries, promoting New Hampshire-based businesses to overseas opportunities and was awarded the Medal of Peace and Commerce by the U.S. Department of Commerce. In my role, I oversaw the Divisions of Economic Development, Travel and Tourism Development, State Parks and Land and Forests, such a diverse but fascinating mix of competing interests that naturally fostered wide-ranging discussions about how to best achieve smart and sustainable growth in New Hampshire. After my term, I joined the French-based energy efficiency multinational corporation, Schneider Electric. I worked with 12 dedicated countries in promoting energy-efficiency technologies for the 4 and 5-star global hotel market and served on the Advisory Board for the Center of Hospitality Research at Cornell University. I am now retired, serving on several boards, most notably with Global Citizens Circle. When did you first learn about Global Citizens Circle, and how has your engagement grown with GCC over the years? I was first introduced to GCC in 1998, after returning to New Hampshire to run a convention hotel in Manchester. I attended a few Circles at the Parker House and was completely taken in by the level and content of the dialogue they fostered. I took notice of the number of New Hampshire people who attended these Circles and offered to host a couple of Circles at the hotel in Manchester to make it more accessible for these New Hampshire residents. Some years later, I met with Eleanor Dunfey-Freiburger and learned of the efforts to reconstitute GCC in collaboration with Southern New Hampshire University. I subsequently joined as an advisor and then joined the board just a few years ago. What have been some of the most meaningful experiences you've had through GCC? It is impossible not to be in awe of the incredibly successful outreach and influence the Dunfey family has had in global conflicts and social issues. Their partners and advisors consisted of global leaders, social activists, Nobel Prize recipients, elders, and emerging leaders, all focused on open discussion and the sharing of experiences and knowledge to encourage proactive efforts to resolving conflict, to finding peace and to promoting diversity, equality and inclusion. In a world so fragmented by violence and politics, these accomplishments resonated strongly with me. What do you tell others about the benefits of supporting and participating in GCC events and activities? We have made recent efforts to re-engage with business leaders, returning to our founding days, to focus on addressing social, environmental, and conflict issues and challenges that we face today. These leaders are in the position to address issues facing us in our respective communities. While some in the political theatre have attempted to make diversity, equity and inclusion a divisive concept, the reality is businesses face major challenges that a diverse employment base brings as well as in the communities in which they operate. An openness to understanding and working with a diverse employment base and community is critical for success today. And, the fact of the matter is, a diverse community offers new ideas, insight, energy, and engagement that keeps us from becoming stagnant. This is the very definition of the successes that have brought us to where we are today. As Board Chair, what are your goals for GCC? As Board Chair, and in our current fiscal year, my objectives are to provide more board support to the remarkable work GCC Executive Director and President Theo Spanos Dunfey and Assistant Director Phoebe de Larrabeiti accomplish, sharply enhance our fundraising efforts, grow our board membership with an emphasis on targeting key business leaders, and to support our outreach in expanding our Emerging Leaders program and Global Partners. It is impossible not to be in awe of the incredibly successful outreach and influence the Dunfey family has had in global conflicts and social issues. |
GCC Voices
Archives
December 2024
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed